<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simplyeko.com/microsoft-office-2010-technical-review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simplyeko.com/microsoft-office-2010-technical-review.html</link>
	<description>Blogging - Technology - Me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:59:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitchen Towels </title>
		<link>http://simplyeko.com/microsoft-office-2010-technical-review.html#comment-3669</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitchen Towels </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplyeko.com/?p=930#comment-3669</guid>
		<description>i use both open office and microsoft office and i would say that microsoft office is more responsive and user friendly *.~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use both open office and microsoft office and i would say that microsoft office is more responsive and user friendly *.~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boe</title>
		<link>http://simplyeko.com/microsoft-office-2010-technical-review.html#comment-2850</link>
		<dc:creator>boe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplyeko.com/?p=930#comment-2850</guid>
		<description>Nothing beneficial for most businesses – no reason to upgrade/purchase – 

Like Vista – all bling – no function.

If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.

2. Full OLE support for pictures in access – umm wasn’t that functional with Office XP – why take that out? Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database? Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code. Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?

3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don’t want to learn the new menu bar. You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar. Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I’m one person and most of my clients don’t like it so prefer to stick with office 2003. MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing beneficial for most businesses – no reason to upgrade/purchase – </p>
<p>Like Vista – all bling – no function.</p>
<p>If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -<br />
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.</p>
<p>2. Full OLE support for pictures in access – umm wasn’t that functional with Office XP – why take that out? Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database? Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code. Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?</p>
<p>3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don’t want to learn the new menu bar. You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar. Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I’m one person and most of my clients don’t like it so prefer to stick with office 2003. MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trucs-astuces.net</title>
		<link>http://simplyeko.com/microsoft-office-2010-technical-review.html#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator>trucs-astuces.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplyeko.com/?p=930#comment-2723</guid>
		<description>très intéressant post, merci</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>très intéressant post, merci</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sagar</title>
		<link>http://simplyeko.com/microsoft-office-2010-technical-review.html#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator>sagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplyeko.com/?p=930#comment-2705</guid>
		<description>thats great.

sagar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats great.</p>
<p>sagar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://simplyeko.com/microsoft-office-2010-technical-review.html#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simplyeko.com/?p=930#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>wow.. That sounds great..
well all I could say is that, good that MS had its 
2010 reviews.. that is so advanced, at least we will be aware of the new thing coming out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow.. That sounds great..<br />
well all I could say is that, good that MS had its<br />
2010 reviews.. that is so advanced, at least we will be aware of the new thing coming out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

